Search Resources
Coronavirus: Updated COVID-19 FAQs for employers who are sponsorship licence holders
TUPE: Contract variations beneficial to an employee in anticipation of a TUPE transfer held to be void - Ferguson and others v Astrea Asset Management Ltd 2020
Court of Appeal holds that an ambiguous dismissal letter to dyslexic employee may be enough to extend the limitation period for bringing a claim - Lowri Beck Services Ltd v Brophy
Court of Justice of the European Union provides useful clarification on worker status under the Working Time Directive - B v Yodel Delivery Network Ltd
A summary of the health and safety provisions under sections 44 and 100 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 that employers should be aware of amid COVID-19.
Constructive dismissal: EAT allows claim to proceed despite last straw event being ‘entirely innocuous’- Williams v Alderman Davies Church in Wales Primary School
A summary of the new ACAS guidance for employers on disciplinary and grievance procedures during the Coronavirus pandemic
High Court rules on furlough and insolvency in the first case on the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme- Re Carluccios Limited (in administration) [2020]
Supreme Court decides employer is not vicariously liable for employee’s data protection breach- W M Morrison Supermarkets plc v Various Claimants
A reminder of an employer’s legal responsibilities on mental health within the workplace
Updated Home Office guidance for Tier 2 and 5 sponsors ahead of the new financial year
Top tips for Productive Homeworking for Business and Charity Professionals with BrightBird
EAT considers the impact of a material fact not being shared with a dismissing officer in deciding whether an employer has acted reasonably when dismissing - Uddin v London Borough of Ealing
EAT holds that an employer who was concerned about their reputation fairly dismissed an employee charged with a criminal offence - Lafferty v Nuffield Health
Court of Appeal considers to what extent an employer may be liable for inducing a breach of post-termination restrictive covenants - Allen t/a David Allen Chartered Accountants v Dodd & Co
EAT holds that capping compensation for disabled employees was unfavourable treatment under the Equality Act 2010 - Chief Constable of Gwent Police v Parsons and Robert
Tribunal holds that ethical veganism is protected as a philosophical belief under the Equality Act 2010
Pages
The law and practice referred to in this article or webinar has been paraphrased or summarised. It might not be up-to-date with changes in the law and we do not guarantee the accuracy of any information provided at the time of reading. It should not be construed or relied upon as legal advice in relation to a specific set of circumstances.
